After Maoism, the Next Battle is for Adivasi Trust

Why in News?

On 19 May 2026, the Union Home Minister stated in Jagdalpur that the fight against Maoism would remain incomplete until every resident of Bastar is integrated into the mainstream. Following the declaration of India as “Maoist-free” on 31 March 2026, the government’s next goal is to ensure the welfare, development, and democratic empowerment of tribal communities in Bastar by 2031.

---

Core Issue: From Security to Trust-Building

While the decline of Maoist violence marks a significant security achievement, lasting peace in tribal regions cannot be secured through security operations alone.

The focus is now shifting from:

• Counter-insurgency → Good Governance
• Security Operations → Constitutional Empowerment
• Infrastructure Development → Community Participation
• State Presence → Tribal Trust

The central challenge is winning the confidence of tribal communities whose concerns revolve around “Jal, Jungle, and Zameen” (Water, Forests, and Land).

---

Governance Structure in Tribal Areas

India’s constitutional framework provides two parallel governance mechanisms:

1. Democratic Local Governance

• Gram Sabha
• Gram Panchayat
• Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)

2. Administrative Governance

• Tehsildar
• District Collector
• State bureaucracy

Ideally, elected local institutions should function autonomously and not be overshadowed by bureaucratic structures.

---

Why Development Alone is Not Enough

The government has expanded:

• Roads
• Mobile connectivity
• Welfare schemes
• Administrative outreach

However, tribal communities continue to raise concerns regarding:

• Land alienation
• Forest rights
• Mining projects
• Displacement
• Resource ownership
• Cultural autonomy

Therefore, experts argue that sustainable peace requires addressing structural governance issues rather than focusing solely on development indicators.

---

Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA)

Purpose

The PESA Act extends Panchayati Raj provisions to Fifth Schedule tribal areas and recognizes tribal self-governance.

Constitutional Basis

• Article 243M(4)(b)
• Extends Part IX of the Constitution to Scheduled Areas with modifications.

Applicability

Applies to Scheduled Areas in:

• Andhra Pradesh
• Chhattisgarh
• Gujarat
• Himachal Pradesh
• Jharkhand
• Madhya Pradesh
• Maharashtra
• Odisha
• Rajasthan
• Telangana

---

Salient Features of PESA

1. Gram Sabha as the Foundation of Self-Government

The Gram Sabha is empowered to:

• Protect tribal culture and traditions
• Preserve customary laws
• Manage community resources
• Resolve local disputes

---

2. Recognition of Traditional Rights

The Act legally recognizes:

• Tribal customs
• Traditional governance systems
• Community resource management practices

---

3. Political Representation

Reservation of Seats

• Seats reserved according to population share.
• Scheduled Tribes must receive at least 50% reservation.

Leadership Reservation

• Chairperson positions at all Panchayat levels reserved for STs.

---

4. Representation of Unrepresented Tribes

State governments may nominate members of tribal groups lacking representation in Panchayat institutions.

---

Powers Granted Under PESA

Resource and Social Control

Gram Sabhas can:

Minor Forest Produce

• Exercise ownership rights over minor forest produce.

Intoxicants

• Regulate or prohibit sale and consumption of intoxicants.

Village Markets

• Manage local markets.

Money Lending

• Regulate money-lending practices affecting STs.

Development Planning

• Control local development plans and resources.

---

Land Protection

Gram Sabhas have powers to:

• Prevent alienation of tribal land.
• Restore illegally transferred tribal land.

This is one of the most important safeguards under PESA.

---

Areas Requiring Mandatory Consultation

The Act mandates consultation with Gram Sabhas before:

1. Land Acquisition

• Development projects
• Rehabilitation and resettlement of affected persons

2. Management of Minor Water Bodies

• Planning and administration

3. Mining Activities

• Prospecting licences
• Mining leases for minor minerals

4. Mineral Concessions

• Granting concessions through auctions

---

Key Concerns in Implementation

Weak Implementation

Although PESA provides extensive powers, implementation remains uneven across states.

Major issues include:

• Delayed framing of rules
• Administrative interference
• Limited devolution of powers
• Weak awareness among tribal communities

---

Dilution of Gram Sabha Powers

Example:

Chhattisgarh Proposal (2022)

A proposal sought to replace Gram Sabha “consent” with mere “consultation”.

Potential consequences:

• Reduced local decision-making authority.
• Easier approval of projects affecting tribal lands.

---

Allegations of Procedural Violations

Reports have highlighted:

• Manipulation of Gram Sabha proceedings.
• Fabricated resolutions.
• Inadequate participation in decision-making.

These practices undermine the spirit of self-governance envisioned under PESA.

---

Significance for Bastar and Post-Maoist Governance

With Maoist influence declining, governance will increasingly be evaluated on:

• Protection of constitutional rights
• Fair justice delivery
• Respect for tribal autonomy
• Genuine decentralization
• Accountability of state institutions

Tribal communities are becoming more aware of their legal and constitutional entitlements and are likely to demand greater participation in governance.

---

Conclusion

The end of Maoist violence is only the beginning of a larger challenge: building trust between the State and tribal communities.

Long-term peace in Bastar will depend not merely on roads, welfare schemes, or security operations, but on respecting constitutional guarantees and empowering Gram Sabhas through effective implementation of PESA. Strengthening local self-governance, protecting tribal rights over land and resources, and ensuring meaningful participation in decision-making are essential for achieving inclusive development and durable peace.