The ECI’s Lack of Transparency in Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls

Context

  • On June 24, the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, later extended to the entire country.

  • Aim: Verify ~8 crore voters in Bihar, ~100 crore nationwide.

  • Concerns: The process has been carried out without public consultation or adequate disclosure.

Key Facts & Figures

  • 65 lakh voters deleted in Bihar’s draft list after Phase 1 SIR — ~27,000 per constituency.

  • Winning margins in 2020 elections: This deletion figure exceeds the margin in two-thirds of seats.

  • Deletion reasons (per ECI):

    • Dead: 22 lakh

    • Shifted/not found: 36 lakh

    • Multiple registrations: 7 lakh

  • No full list of deleted names with reasons made public; booth-level lists shared with parties but without deletion reasons.

  • Only voters on 2003 Bihar rolls exempted from producing proof of citizenship.


Major Concerns

1. Lack of Transparency

  • No prior public notice before undertaking SIR in Bihar.

  • Absence of granular data → prevents verification and oversight.

  • The “independent appraisal” cited in ECI affidavit not included in the 800-page document.

2. Arbitrariness & Timing

  • No clear rationale for starting with poll-bound Bihar.

  • Conducted during monsoons, complicating verification in flood-prone areas.

3. Citizenship Proof Requirement

  • First time large-scale demand for documents proving citizenship (passport, birth certificates).

  • Raises fears of National Register of Citizens (NRC) via backdoor.

  • No public records to confirm ECI’s claim that similar checks were done in 2003.

4. Missing Historical Records

  • Orders/guidelines from 2003 intensive revision untraceable in public domain or ECI archives.

  • Journalists’ requests for records met with claims that they cannot be located.


Implications

For Electoral Integrity

  • Large-scale deletions risk disenfranchising eligible voters, disproportionately impacting marginalised groups.

  • Can potentially alter election outcomes.

For Democracy & Institutions

  • Erodes public trust in ECI.

  • Sets precedent for opaque, arbitrary voter verification exercises.

For Citizens’ Rights

  • Failure to prove citizenship may lead to loss of voting rights or referral to authorities under Citizenship Act, 1955.


Way Forward

  1. Transparency & Disclosure

    • Publish complete deletion lists with reasons.

    • Share independent appraisal findings.

    • Restore & publish historical revision records (e.g., 2003 Bihar).

  2. Public Consultation

    • Involve civil society & political parties before such exercises.

    • Avoid timing that hinders verification (e.g., monsoon season).

  3. Safeguards Against Arbitrary Disenfranchisement

    • Robust grievance redressal mechanisms.

    • Ensure no disproportionate targeting of vulnerable groups.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *