The ECI’s Lack of Transparency in Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls
Context
-
On June 24, the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, later extended to the entire country.
-
Aim: Verify ~8 crore voters in Bihar, ~100 crore nationwide.
-
Concerns: The process has been carried out without public consultation or adequate disclosure.
Key Facts & Figures
-
65 lakh voters deleted in Bihar’s draft list after Phase 1 SIR — ~27,000 per constituency.
-
Winning margins in 2020 elections: This deletion figure exceeds the margin in two-thirds of seats.
-
Deletion reasons (per ECI):
-
Dead: 22 lakh
-
Shifted/not found: 36 lakh
-
Multiple registrations: 7 lakh
-
-
No full list of deleted names with reasons made public; booth-level lists shared with parties but without deletion reasons.
-
Only voters on 2003 Bihar rolls exempted from producing proof of citizenship.
Major Concerns
1. Lack of Transparency
-
No prior public notice before undertaking SIR in Bihar.
-
Absence of granular data → prevents verification and oversight.
-
The “independent appraisal” cited in ECI affidavit not included in the 800-page document.
2. Arbitrariness & Timing
-
No clear rationale for starting with poll-bound Bihar.
-
Conducted during monsoons, complicating verification in flood-prone areas.
3. Citizenship Proof Requirement
-
First time large-scale demand for documents proving citizenship (passport, birth certificates).
-
Raises fears of National Register of Citizens (NRC) via backdoor.
-
No public records to confirm ECI’s claim that similar checks were done in 2003.
4. Missing Historical Records
-
Orders/guidelines from 2003 intensive revision untraceable in public domain or ECI archives.
-
Journalists’ requests for records met with claims that they cannot be located.
Implications
For Electoral Integrity
-
Large-scale deletions risk disenfranchising eligible voters, disproportionately impacting marginalised groups.
-
Can potentially alter election outcomes.
For Democracy & Institutions
-
Erodes public trust in ECI.
-
Sets precedent for opaque, arbitrary voter verification exercises.
For Citizens’ Rights
-
Failure to prove citizenship may lead to loss of voting rights or referral to authorities under Citizenship Act, 1955.
Way Forward
-
Transparency & Disclosure
-
Publish complete deletion lists with reasons.
-
Share independent appraisal findings.
-
Restore & publish historical revision records (e.g., 2003 Bihar).
-
-
Public Consultation
-
Involve civil society & political parties before such exercises.
-
Avoid timing that hinders verification (e.g., monsoon season).
-
-
Safeguards Against Arbitrary Disenfranchisement
-
Robust grievance redressal mechanisms.
-
Ensure no disproportionate targeting of vulnerable groups.
-





