The ECI does not have unfettered powers” by P.D.T. Achary (former Secretary General of the Lok Sabha)
Context:
- The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections in November 2025.
- The move has drawn criticism and legal challenges over its legality and timing.
- This article examines the constitutional and legal boundaries of the ECI’s powers.
Constitutional Provisions:
- Article 324: Vests the superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the ECI.
- Article 326: Guarantees universal adult suffrage for all Indian citizens aged 18 and above unless disqualified by law.
Legal Framework under the Representation of the People Acts:
| Provision | Content |
| RPA 1950 – Section 21 | Deals with preparation and revision of electoral rolls. Includes: 1) Regular annual revision 2) Revision before general/by-elections 3) Special revision for constituency or part thereof (not entire state) |
| RPA 1950 – Section 14 | Qualifying date for inclusion in the roll is January 1 of the relevant year. |
| RPA 1950 – Section 19 & 20 | Criteria: Minimum age of 18 + ordinary residence in constituency. |
| Rule 8 of Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 | Citizens must provide information “to the best of their ability”; strict documentation cannot be insisted upon. |
Issues with the ECI’s Current SIR in Bihar:
- Questionable Legal Standing:
- The ECI order sets 01/07/2025 as the qualifying date, which lacks statutory basis (violates Section 14).
- The term “Special Intensive Revision” does not exist in the RPA, 1950.
- Scope of Revision:
- Section 21(3) allows special revision only for a constituency or part, not the entire state as being done in Bihar.
- Violation of Natural Justice:
- Allegations that people are being removed without proper verification or appeals.
- Risk of disenfranchisement of marginalized communities, including migrants and minorities.
- Supreme Court Jurisprudence:
- In Mohinder Singh Gill vs CEC (1978): ECI must act within the framework of existing laws where applicable. Article 324 fills only legislative gaps — not a license for arbitrary action.
Implications for Electoral Democracy:
| Positive Potential | Legal/Constitutional Challenges |
| – Cleaning up voter rolls – Ensuring only genuine voters participate |
– Could undermine voter rights – Allegations of motivated disenfranchisement – ECI’s neutrality under question |
Way Forward / Recommendations:
- Adhere to Legal Mandates:
- Follow Section 21 strictly and ensure qualifying dates align with the law.
- Transparency & Due Process:
- Ensure voters are informed, consulted, and given hearing before deletion.
- Strengthen Oversight:
- Supreme Court or an independent Election Tribunal should oversee controversial electoral roll revisions.
- Reinforce ECI Independence:
- Current demand for collegium-based appointments (as done for CEC recently) should extend to Election Commissioners as well.
- Improve Voter Registration Technology:
- Use Aadhaar linkages (voluntary), GIS data, and door-to-door campaigns to ensure robust and inclusive voter rolls.





