The ECI does not have unfettered powers” by P.D.T. Achary (former Secretary General of the Lok Sabha)

Context:

  • The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar, ahead of the upcoming Assembly elections in November 2025.
  • The move has drawn criticism and legal challenges over its legality and timing.
  • This article examines the constitutional and legal boundaries of the ECI’s powers.

Constitutional Provisions:

  • Article 324: Vests the superintendence, direction, and control of elections in the ECI.
  • Article 326: Guarantees universal adult suffrage for all Indian citizens aged 18 and above unless disqualified by law.

Legal Framework under the Representation of the People Acts:

Provision Content
RPA 1950 – Section 21 Deals with preparation and revision of electoral rolls. Includes:
1) Regular annual revision
2) Revision before general/by-elections
3) Special revision for constituency or part thereof (not entire state)
RPA 1950 – Section 14 Qualifying date for inclusion in the roll is January 1 of the relevant year.
RPA 1950 – Section 19 & 20 Criteria: Minimum age of 18 + ordinary residence in constituency.
Rule 8 of Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 Citizens must provide information “to the best of their ability”; strict documentation cannot be insisted upon.

Issues with the ECI’s Current SIR in Bihar:

  1. Questionable Legal Standing:
    • The ECI order sets 01/07/2025 as the qualifying date, which lacks statutory basis (violates Section 14).
    • The term “Special Intensive Revision” does not exist in the RPA, 1950.
  2. Scope of Revision:
    • Section 21(3) allows special revision only for a constituency or part, not the entire state as being done in Bihar.
  3. Violation of Natural Justice:
    • Allegations that people are being removed without proper verification or appeals.
    • Risk of disenfranchisement of marginalized communities, including migrants and minorities.
  4. Supreme Court Jurisprudence:
    • In Mohinder Singh Gill vs CEC (1978): ECI must act within the framework of existing laws where applicable. Article 324 fills only legislative gaps — not a license for arbitrary action.

Implications for Electoral Democracy:

Positive Potential Legal/Constitutional Challenges
– Cleaning up voter rolls
– Ensuring only genuine voters participate
– Could undermine voter rights
– Allegations of motivated disenfranchisement
ECI’s neutrality under question

Way Forward / Recommendations:

  1. Adhere to Legal Mandates:
    • Follow Section 21 strictly and ensure qualifying dates align with the law.
  2. Transparency & Due Process:
    • Ensure voters are informed, consulted, and given hearing before deletion.
  3. Strengthen Oversight:
    • Supreme Court or an independent Election Tribunal should oversee controversial electoral roll revisions.
  4. Reinforce ECI Independence:
    • Current demand for collegium-based appointments (as done for CEC recently) should extend to Election Commissioners as well.
  5. Improve Voter Registration Technology:
    • Use Aadhaar linkages (voluntary), GIS data, and door-to-door campaigns to ensure robust and inclusive voter rolls.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *