Reservation must not be based on religion-  Supreme Court

 

Context:

Recently, the Supreme Court of India,  orally observed that reservation must not be based on religion while hearing an appeal filed by the State of West Bengal against a Calcutta High Court judgment striking down its policy to include several castes, largely Muslim communities, in the State’s Other Backward Classes (OBC) list.

 

Relevance:
GS-02 (Government Policies and Interventions)

 

Key Highlights:

  • The Supreme Court observation:
    • The case was largely regarding Muslim communities of West Bengal, regarding their inclusion in the OBC list.
    • The Supreme Court stated that the reservations must not be based on religion.
    • It even directed the state to clarify the nature and scope of the survey identifying the social and educational backwardness of these communities.

 

Rohini Commission:

  • The commission was set up on 2nd October,2017 under Article 370, to examine the inequitable distribution of benefits among OBCs listed in the Central List.
  • The commission planned to propose scientific parameters for sub-categorizing OBCs and classify respective castes or communities into their respective sub-categories.
  • Need for Sub-categorisation:
    • It was observed that 97% of the benefit went to only 25% of OBC castes and 37% of the total had zero representation in jobs and educational institutions.
    • Sub-categorisation aims to create quotas within 27% reservation.

 

Mandal Commission:

  • It was formed in December 1978 under the chairmanship of B. P. Mandal to define socially and educationally backward classes and recommend measures for their advancement.
  • The Commission proposed 27% reservation in government jobs for OBCs based on various indicators of backwardness.
  • It identified backward classes among Hindus and non-Hindus, generating an extensive OBC list of 3,743 castes.
  • The Supreme Court upheld the 27% quota but limited reservation beneficiaries’ total count to 50% of the population.
  • The concept of ‘creamy layer’ was introduced to exclude affluent individuals from reservation benefits.

Constitutional Provisions:

  • Articles 15(4) and 16(4) enable reservation for SCs and STs in government services.
  • Article 16(4A) allows reservation in promotions for SCs and STs.
  • Article 16(4B) enables the filling of unfilled SC/ST vacancies in the succeeding year, bypassing the 50% reservation cap.
  • Specific reservation provisions are made in Parliament, State Legislative Assemblies, Panchayats, and Municipalities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *