One Nation, One Election — remedy worse than disease

1. Background

One Nation, One Election (ONOE) refers to simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha and all State Legislative Assemblies, instead of the current staggered election schedule.

  • India originally followed simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies in 1951-52, 1957, 1962 and 1967.

  • The cycle broke due to:

    • Premature dissolution of assemblies

    • Political instability and coalition governments

    • Article 356 impositions

    • Lok Sabha dissolutions in 1970, 1979, 1991 etc.

Since then, elections are held frequently across states.


2. Definition

One Nation, One Election (ONOE):
A system where Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections are conducted simultaneously across India, ideally once every five years, with all governments beginning and ending their terms together.


3. Recent Policy Developments

High-Level Committee on ONOE (2023–24)

  • Chaired by Ram Nath Kovind.

  • Recommended two phases of synchronisation:

    1. Lok Sabha + State Assemblies

    2. Later inclusion of local body elections

Constitutional Amendment Proposal

Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024

Key proposal: New Article 82A


4. Key Constitutional Provisions Proposed

1. Article 82A (New Article)

  • President notifies an “appointed date”.

  • From that date, all Assembly terms align with Lok Sabha cycle.


2. Amendments Proposed

  • Article 83 → Tenure of Parliament

  • Article 172 → Tenure of State Assemblies

  • Article 327 → Parliamentary power over elections


3. Unexpired-Term Elections

If a legislature falls mid-term:

  • Fresh election

  • New House serves only the remainder of the original 5-year cycle

  • No fresh full tenure.


4. Election Deferral Power

  • Election Commission may recommend deferring State elections if simultaneous polls are impracticable.


5. Constitutional Concepts Involved

Parliamentary System

A system where:

  • Executive is responsible to the legislature

  • Government survives only as long as it enjoys majority support

Relevant Articles:

  • Article 75 → Collective responsibility of Union Council of Ministers

  • Article 164 → Collective responsibility of State Council of Ministers


Federalism

Federalism means division of power between Union and States with constitutional autonomy.

Recognised as Basic Structure in:

  • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India


Basic Structure Doctrine

Principle that certain core features of the Constitution cannot be altered even by amendment.

Established in:

  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala

Key elements include:

  • Federalism

  • Parliamentary democracy

  • Judicial review

  • Rule of law


6. Arguments in Favour of ONOE

1. Reduced Election Expenditure

  • Government expenditure estimated around ₹4,500 crore

  • Multiple elections increase administrative cost.


2. Reduced Model Code of Conduct (MCC) Disruption

Frequent elections lead to:

  • Policy paralysis

  • Delays in development projects


3. Better Governance

  • Governments focus on policy instead of continuous campaigning.


4. Efficient Use of Security Forces

  • Central forces currently deployed repeatedly for different elections.


5. Higher Voter Participation

Some argue that combined elections increase turnout.


7. Arguments Against ONOE

1. Threat to Federalism

States have independent political cycles.

Synchronisation may:

  • Curtail State mandates

  • Reduce State autonomy


2. Violation of Parliamentary Accountability

Parliamentary system allows:

  • Early dissolution

  • Loss of majority

ONOE treats dissolution as a problem rather than a democratic safeguard.


3. Problem of “Truncated Mandates”

Under unexpired-term elections:

  • Governments may rule only 1–2 years

  • Weak incentives for long-term policy.


4. National Wave Dominance

India uses First-Past-The-Post (FPTP).

Simultaneous elections may cause:

  • National issues overshadowing State issues

  • Dominance of national parties.


8. Administrative Challenges

Election Logistics

Simultaneous elections would require:

  • Large numbers of EVMs and VVPATs

  • Massive deployment of security forces

  • Larger administrative capacity.


Financial Impact

Savings are relatively small:

  • Around 0.03% of GDP

  • Around 0.25% of Union Budget


9. Risk of President’s Rule Misuse

Relevant provision:

  • Article 356

Concern:

If a government collapses mid-term:

  • Centre may impose President’s Rule

  • Delay elections to match national cycle.


10. Global Comparisons

Indonesia

Indonesia held simultaneous elections in 2019.

Problems reported:

  • Poll worker fatigue

  • Hundreds of deaths due to administrative overload.

Later judicial intervention required separating elections.


Canada

Canada

  • Federal and provincial elections occur independently.


Germany

Germany

  • State elections deliberately staggered.

  • Stability comes from Constructive Vote of No Confidence.


United States

United States

  • Fixed election cycles

  • Works because executive tenure is fixed in presidential system.


11. Key Governance Concerns

Governance Dead Zone

Caretaker government may operate:

  • Without full legislative authority

  • Unable to present full budget.

Relevant Articles:

  • Article 112–117 → Budget

  • Article 116 → Vote on Account

  • Article 85 → Parliament must meet every 6 months.


12. Supreme Court Position on Institutional Design

In the NJAC judgement (2015):

  • Constitutional validity depends on institutional safeguards

  • Not on assurances of good intentions.

Case:

  • Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India


13. Way Forward

Possible alternatives instead of full ONOE:

  1. Two-cycle election system

    • Elections twice every 5 years.

  2. Fixed election windows

  3. Strengthen anti-defection laws

  4. Constructive vote of no confidence

  5. Improve election management capacity


14. Conclusion (UPSC Mains Ready)

ONOE seeks administrative efficiency but raises deep constitutional concerns regarding federalism, parliamentary accountability, and electoral fairness. While synchronised elections may reduce costs and disruptions, reforms must ensure that India’s federal democratic structure and legislative responsibility remain intact.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *