Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025Β 

Why in News?

  • The Lok Sabha passed the Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025 during the Monsoon Session.

  • The Bill replaces and significantly condenses the Income Tax Act, 1961, while expanding certain enforcement powers of tax officials.


Background

  • Income Tax Act, 1961 – the principal legislation governing direct taxes in India for over six decades.

  • In February 2025, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced a revised Bill to simplify and rationalise the law.

  • The Bill was referred to a Select Committee chaired by Baijayant Panda.

  • Recommendations submitted on 21 July 2025 β†’ Government withdrew earlier version β†’ Introduced updated Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025.


Key Features of the New Bill

1. Structural Simplification

  • Word count reduced from ~5.12 lakh (1961 Act) β†’ ~2.59 lakh.

  • Chapters reduced: 47 β†’ 23.

  • Sections reduced: 819 β†’ 536.

  • Tables increased: 18 β†’ 57 (for clarity).

  • Formulae increased: 6 β†’ 46.

2. Broadening Powers in Search & Seizure

  • Any person in possession/control of digital records must:

    • Provide access codes/passwords.

    • Assist authorised officers in accessing data.

  • Authorised officers can override access codes if not provided voluntarily.

  • Access applies to emails, social media, messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp), and other electronic records.

3. Rationale by Select Committee

  • Digital evidence is crucial in tax evasion cases.

  • Password non-disclosure is a common hurdle.

  • Strengthened powers aim to tackle concealed income and money laundering.

4. Opposition & Dissent Notes

  • Congress MP Amar Singh – warned against β€œvery wide-ranging” powers to access all personal digital data.

  • RSP MP N.K. Premachandran – argued provisions are:

    • Arbitrary, excessive powers.

    • Risk of misuse.

    • Potential infringement of Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017).

  • Suggested retaining original 1961 Act provisions.


Constitutional & Legal Dimensions

  • Article 21 – Protection of life and personal liberty β†’ includes Right to Privacy.

  • Puttaswamy Judgment (2017) – Privacy is a fundamental right; restrictions must satisfy:

    1. Legality – backed by law.

    2. Necessity – legitimate state interest.

    3. Proportionality – least intrusive means.

  • Possible challenge: whether new search powers satisfy the proportionality test.


Advantages Claimed

  • Ease of understanding for taxpayers and professionals.

  • Consolidation β†’ fewer sections, simpler language.

  • Clearer tables & formulae aid compliance.

  • Stronger tools to combat digital tax evasion.


Concerns & Criticism

  • Privacy Infringement – scope to monitor personal communications.

  • Potential for misuse – arbitrary targeting.

  • Chilling effect – fear among honest taxpayers.

  • Ambiguity – terms like β€œaccess code” and β€œoverride” not clearly defined.

  • Checks & balances – need for independent oversight.


Possible Safeguards

  • Clear rules on authorisation level for search.

  • Independent review before accessing personal communication.

  • Stronger data protection protocols (alignment with Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023).

  • Parliamentary oversight or judicial warrant in sensitive cases.

 

Old vs. New Provisions β€” Income Tax Law

Aspect Income Tax Act, 1961 (Old) Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025 (New)
Length ~5.12 lakh words ~2.59 lakh words
Chapters 47 23
Sections 819 536
Tables 18 57
Formulae 6 46
Language & Structure Complex legal drafting Simplified & rationalised format
Search & Seizure (Electronic Data) Access to physical & electronic records, but no explicit provision for overriding passwords Explicitly mandates taxpayers to share access codes/passwords; empowers officials to override access codes to emails, chats, social media
Powers in Electronic Search Dependent on taxpayer cooperation Officials can forcibly bypass security if taxpayer refuses
Basis of Law Built over decades with amendments Fresh drafting incorporating Select Committee recommendations
Privacy Concerns Fewer direct conflicts due to absence of explicit override powers Potential conflict with Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy judgment, 2017)
Legislative Process Amended through periodic Finance Acts Introduced Feb 2025 β†’ Reviewed by Select Committee (Chair: Baijayant Panda) β†’ Updated Bill passed Aug 2025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *