An Anti-Terror Role that Defies Logic
Core Argument
The article critiques the UN’s decision to give Pakistan leadership roles in counter-terrorism bodies, despite its well-documented history of harbouring, financing, and sponsoring terrorism. This undermines the UN’s credibility and poses risks for India’s security and diplomatic positioning.
Key Points
Pakistan’s Terror Links
-
Hosted Osama bin Laden near its military academy.
-
Supports LeT, JeM and other groups behind 26/11 (2008), Pulwama (2019), and Pahalgam attack (April 2025).
-
Operation Sindoor: India’s counter-strike exposing terror launchpads across the LoC.
-
Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar’s family, and other designated terrorists openly protected/celebrated in Pakistan.
-
Compensation of ₹14 crore given to families of slain terrorists in 2025.
UN’s Controversial Decision
-
June 2025: Pakistan made Chair of Taliban Sanctions Committee and Vice-chair of UNSC Counter-Terrorism Committee.
-
July 2025: Pakistan assumed UNSC Presidency for a month.
-
Similar past controversies: Libya chairing UN Human Rights Commission; Saudi Arabia chairing UN Women’s Rights Commission.
-
IMF loan of $1B to Pakistan (despite misuse risks) shows institutional blind spots.
Why This Undermines UN Credibility
-
Contradiction – Pakistan’s state-sponsored terror vs. counter-terror leadership.
-
Weak Vetting – FATF’s removal of Pakistan from grey list despite ongoing concerns.
-
Geopolitics over Principles – big powers back Pakistan for strategic/economic reasons.
-
Dangerous Signal – rewarding duplicity emboldens state sponsors of terror.
Implications for India
-
Pakistan may use UN platforms to deflect blame, undermine India’s case against terror, and reshape narratives.
-
Could block India’s efforts to sanction terrorists globally.
-
Might interfere with India’s growing ties with the Taliban.
-
Enhances risk of cross-border terrorism, infiltration, and cyberwarfare.
India’s Strategic Options
-
Alliances in UNSC – leverage ties with U.S., France, Russia, others to counter Pakistan’s influence.
-
Proactive Diplomacy – actively raise Pakistan’s terror record in UN discussions.
-
Engage Taliban directly – humanitarian/diplomatic outreach to reduce Pakistan’s leverage.
-
Global Media & Diaspora Campaign – expose Pakistan’s duplicity internationally.
-
Strengthen National Security & Intelligence – prepare for intensified asymmetric warfare.
-
Push for Accountability – demand performance reviews of countries chairing UN committees.
Big Picture
-
The UN risks becoming a stage for geopolitical compromises rather than a platform for justice and security.
-
Allowing Pakistan to shape global counter-terror policies is not just illogical—it is dangerous.
-
For India, silence or caution is not enough: sustained, proactive diplomacy is essential.
