A lofty concept, a Governor and unwanted controversy
Relevance: GS2 POLITY
Context
- A confrontation arose between the Governor of Kerala and the state government over the display of a Bharat Mata painting at official events in Raj Bhavan.
- The image, showing a saffron-clad woman with a spear and a lion, is not constitutionally recognized and has sparked debates on protocol and constitutional conduct.
Constitutional Role of the Governor
- Articles 153 to 162: Governor is the constitutional head of the state.
- No independent authority: As per Article 163 and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
- Supreme Court rulings: Reiterated limits on Governorβs discretionary powers (e.g., Nabam Rebia Case, 2016).
The Core Issue
- Display of Bharat Mata image in official rooms of Raj Bhavan during government functions.
- The image used is not recognized as a national symbol by the Constitution or any law.
- Government objected to its inclusion in official protocol, asserting violation of secular and constitutional norms.
Symbolism of Bharat Mata
- Historical Roots:
- Originated in Bankim Chandraβs ‘Anandamath’ (Banga Mata).
- Abanindranath Tagoreβs painting (1905) popularised the image.
- Sister Nivedita promoted it as Bharat Mata.
- Nehruβs Interpretation:
- In The Discovery of India, Nehru says Bharat Mata is the people of India, not a deity or anthropomorphic figure.
- Modern Relevance:
- Anthropomorphism of the nation is outdated.
- Secularism and diversity are foundational to Indian nationalism.
Governor vs State Government
- Recurring clashes between Governors and elected governments over:
- University appointments
- Bill assents and legislative delays
- Protocol breaches
- Kerala Case: Highlights tension due to ideological symbolism in state-run events.
Constitutional & Ethical Dimensions
- Raj Bhavan is a public institution, not private property of the Governor.
- Symbols used in official functions must be approved by the government.
- Protocol and decorum must reflect constitutional secularism, not partisan ideology.





