Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025Β
Why in News?
-
The Lok Sabha passed the Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025 during the Monsoon Session.
-
The Bill replaces and significantly condenses the Income Tax Act, 1961, while expanding certain enforcement powers of tax officials.
Background
-
Income Tax Act, 1961 β the principal legislation governing direct taxes in India for over six decades.
-
In February 2025, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman introduced a revised Bill to simplify and rationalise the law.
-
The Bill was referred to a Select Committee chaired by Baijayant Panda.
-
Recommendations submitted on 21 July 2025 β Government withdrew earlier version β Introduced updated Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025.
Key Features of the New Bill
1. Structural Simplification
-
Word count reduced from ~5.12 lakh (1961 Act) β ~2.59 lakh.
-
Chapters reduced: 47 β 23.
-
Sections reduced: 819 β 536.
-
Tables increased: 18 β 57 (for clarity).
-
Formulae increased: 6 β 46.
2. Broadening Powers in Search & Seizure
-
Any person in possession/control of digital records must:
-
Provide access codes/passwords.
-
Assist authorised officers in accessing data.
-
-
Authorised officers can override access codes if not provided voluntarily.
-
Access applies to emails, social media, messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp), and other electronic records.
3. Rationale by Select Committee
-
Digital evidence is crucial in tax evasion cases.
-
Password non-disclosure is a common hurdle.
-
Strengthened powers aim to tackle concealed income and money laundering.
4. Opposition & Dissent Notes
-
Congress MP Amar Singh β warned against βvery wide-rangingβ powers to access all personal digital data.
-
RSP MP N.K. Premachandran β argued provisions are:
-
Arbitrary, excessive powers.
-
Risk of misuse.
-
Potential infringement of Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy v. Union of India, 2017).
-
-
Suggested retaining original 1961 Act provisions.
Constitutional & Legal Dimensions
-
Article 21 β Protection of life and personal liberty β includes Right to Privacy.
-
Puttaswamy Judgment (2017) β Privacy is a fundamental right; restrictions must satisfy:
-
Legality β backed by law.
-
Necessity β legitimate state interest.
-
Proportionality β least intrusive means.
-
-
Possible challenge: whether new search powers satisfy the proportionality test.
Advantages Claimed
-
Ease of understanding for taxpayers and professionals.
-
Consolidation β fewer sections, simpler language.
-
Clearer tables & formulae aid compliance.
-
Stronger tools to combat digital tax evasion.
Concerns & Criticism
-
Privacy Infringement β scope to monitor personal communications.
-
Potential for misuse β arbitrary targeting.
-
Chilling effect β fear among honest taxpayers.
-
Ambiguity β terms like βaccess codeβ and βoverrideβ not clearly defined.
-
Checks & balances β need for independent oversight.
Possible Safeguards
-
Clear rules on authorisation level for search.
-
Independent review before accessing personal communication.
-
Stronger data protection protocols (alignment with Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023).
-
Parliamentary oversight or judicial warrant in sensitive cases.
Old vs. New Provisions β Income Tax Law
| Aspect | Income Tax Act, 1961 (Old) | Income Tax (No. 2) Bill, 2025 (New) |
| Length | ~5.12 lakh words | ~2.59 lakh words |
| Chapters | 47 | 23 |
| Sections | 819 | 536 |
| Tables | 18 | 57 |
| Formulae | 6 | 46 |
| Language & Structure | Complex legal drafting | Simplified & rationalised format |
| Search & Seizure (Electronic Data) | Access to physical & electronic records, but no explicit provision for overriding passwords | Explicitly mandates taxpayers to share access codes/passwords; empowers officials to override access codes to emails, chats, social media |
| Powers in Electronic Search | Dependent on taxpayer cooperation | Officials can forcibly bypass security if taxpayer refuses |
| Basis of Law | Built over decades with amendments | Fresh drafting incorporating Select Committee recommendations |
| Privacy Concerns | Fewer direct conflicts due to absence of explicit override powers | Potential conflict with Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy judgment, 2017) |
| Legislative Process | Amended through periodic Finance Acts | Introduced Feb 2025 β Reviewed by Select Committee (Chair: Baijayant Panda) β Updated Bill passed Aug 2025 |





