SC on Eatery Rules Along Kanwar Yatra Route

Why in News?

  • The Supreme Court addressed a plea challenging a requirement for eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display QR codes, owner names, and registration details.
  • Petitioners argued the rule could alienate certain communities and affect freedom of choice and livelihood.

Key Highlights from the Hearing

โžค Freedom of Consumer Choice

  • Justice Sundresh: โ€œThe consumer is the king.โ€
  • The court emphasized the right of Kanwariyas to choose where and what to eat.
  • Raised concerns over eateries changing menus (from non-veg to veg) during yatra for business gains.
  • Stressed on transparency for consumers to make informed decisions.

โžค Food Habits and Alienation

  • Referred to Karl Marx’s quote: “Religion is the opium of the people.”
  • Court observed how food habits can alienate groups and must be handled with care and sensitivity to diversity.

โžค Petitionersโ€™ Arguments

  • Senior Advocates A.M. Singhvi & Huzefa Ahmadi:
    • State actions may ostracize minority-run establishments.
    • Owner identity has no link to food served; disclosure could foster identity politics.
    • Choice must not become a tool for exclusion or surveillance.

โžค States’ Justification

  • Cited central laws requiring food license display for health and safety.
  • Argued that it’s about public health and transparency, not discrimination.

Constitutional & Ethical Dimensions

โžค Article 19 โ€“ Freedom of Occupation & Trade

  • Mandating QR codes and names could be seen as restrictions on business freedom, unless justified reasonably.

โžค Article 21 โ€“ Right to Privacy

  • Naming owners and employees publicly could violate privacy without compelling public interest.

โžค Ethics: Balancing Rights

  • Consumer autonomy vs. minority rights.
  • Transparency vs. discrimination.
  • Ethical governance must avoid ulterior motives in regulation.

Current Status

  • Court observed that Tuesday marked the end of the Kanwar Yatra.
  • Hence, chose not to deliver a judgment, but stressed the need for an equitable approach without hurting sentiments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *