Punjab’s Farm Bills

#GS2 Polity #CenterStateRelations #ConcurrentList

 

After the recent protests by farmers against the three farm laws enacted by the central government, a special session of the Punjab Assembly has not only rejected the laws by a unanimous resolution but also passed three farm amendment Bills removing Punjab from the ambit of the central laws.

 

The need for state bills 

  • In each of the three Bills, the Punjab government has claimed that the application of central laws to the state is being changed to “restore the agricultural safeguards for the farmers through the regulatory framework of Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 to secure and protect the interests and livelihoods of farmers and farm labourers as also all others engaged in agriculture and related activities”.
  • The three Bills mention the agriculture census 2015-16 to underline that 86.2 per cent of farmers in the state are small and marginal, with the majority owning less than two acres of land. Consequently, they have limited access to multiple markets, and lack the negotiation power needed to operate in a private market.
  • Apart from the Governor, the Punjab government’s new farm Bills need the assent of the President since they seek to amend laws passed by the central government. If not, they can at best serve as a symbolic political statement against the Centre’s farm laws.
  • All the three Bills underscore the importance of farmers getting a level playing field in the form of a fair price guarantee.
  • The Bills also point out that agriculture, agricultural markets, and land is the primary legislative domain of the state.

 

Key features 

  • The Bill seeks to address the fears of state farmers about being forced to sell their produce at less than the minimum support price (MSP) with an amendment whereby sale of wheat and paddy shall be valid only if the seller pays a price equal to or greater than the MSP announced by the central government.
  • It states that any person or company or corporate house will be punished with imprisonment of not less than three years and a fine if he signs a contract wherein the farmer is compelled to sell his produce at less than the MSP.
  • This Bill also allows the farmer to approach a civil court, besides seeking remedies available under the central act in case of any differences with the buyer of his produce.
  • The thrust on only wheat and paddy can be explained by the dominance of these two crops in the state. According to Punjab Mandi Board, Punjab contributes 32 per cent of these two foodgrains to the central pool despite its relatively small land area.
  • While the central law abolished any market fees or licences for private players outside the APMCs, the Punjab bills have reintroduced it. The Bills say the state government can notify a fee to be levied on private traders or electronic trading platforms for trade and commerce outside the mandis established under the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. These fees will go towards a fund for the welfare of small and marginal farmers.
  • By bringing the entire state under its ambit, the Bill ensures that the private players will also be regulated by the rules of government mandis. They will have to procure licences and pay the market fees to buy produce from the state.
  • The Essential Commodities Bill, 2020 says the state, aims to protect consumers from hoarding and black marketing of agri produce. Underlining that production, supply, and distribution of goods is also a state subject, the Bill claims the central Act seeks to give unlimited power of stocking essential commodities to traders. Under this Bill, the state of Punjab will have the power to order, provide for regulating or prohibiting the production, supply, distribution, and imposing stock limits under extraordinary circumstances, which may include famine, price rise, natural calamity or any other situation.

 

Criticism 

  • There are questions as to why have these bills covered only two crops? Experts argue that they should cover the whole gamut of crops; such as a marketable surplus of cotton, maize, some pulses and even milk, for which the state decides the MSP.
  • Dr S S Johl, a former Vice-Chancellor of Punjab Agricultural University and national professor of agricultural economics at Indian Council of Agricultural Research, however, called the Bill a part of “vote-bank politics”, and said the amendments will all but block private players from the state.
Print Friendly and PDF
blog comments powered by Disqus