Google Tax - Equalisation levy 

#GS3 #Economy 

Finance Secretary has ruled out any clarification in the form of ‘frequently asked questions’ or FAQs for the newly introduced ‘equalisation levy’ – also called the Google Tax – on foreign e-commerce players, arguing that the law was already ‘very clear’. 

What is the issue? 

  • India has now imposed 2 per cent digital tax on trade and services by non-resident e-commerce firms with a turnover of over Rs 2 crore. 
  • Till last year, the tax was applicable only on digital advertising services, at 6 per cent. Such operators have to pay the tax at the end of each quarter. 
  • It was in 2016 that the equalisation levy of 6 per cent was first introduced (on payments exceeding Rs 1 lakh a year) on payment for online advertisements made to non-residents. 
  • In the Finance Act 2020, the scope of equalization levy was expanded to include e-commerce supply of goods or services. These transactions were to be taxed at 2 per cent if the business earned over ₹2 crore in a financial year. 
  • This provision had found no mention in Budget 2020. Operators are also crying hoarse over the fact that the tax is effective from April 1, 2020, and the first quarterly payment fell due on July 7. 

Concerns raised  

  • There are a few concerns that are being raised by companies and legal experts that the Centre could try to address. 
  • The primary issue is that the income on which the equalisation levy is charged is exempt from Indian income tax. So credit for the tax is not available against any income arising in India. The ability to deduct this levy from the income in the country of residence will depend on the laws in that country, and may not be always possible. 
  • Further, it has not been specified that the levy is on the income earned by the e-commerce operator, it is stated to be on the consideration received by the operator. Therefore, claiming a credit for the levy against the income in the country of residence many prove a problem with most bi-lateral tax treaties covering only tax on income. 
  • The wider definition of ‘E-commerce operator’ — as an entity that owns, operates or manages a digital or electronic facility or platform for online sales of goods or online provision of services, or both — can bring many other digital platforms inadvertently into the ambit of Indian tax law. The revenue can be more specific about the kinds of digital services that are now taxable. 
  • The levy also appears to be covering transactions between two non-residents when one of them has used an Indian IP address to transact. There could be operational difficulties in implementing this. 

Way forward  

  • A way out could be to wait it out for the OECD to finalize its rules regarding this issue. While this could lead to further delay, at least the solution will be part of a global consensus and may be more acceptable to the operators. A multilateral solution based on the work of the 137 members of the Inclusive Framework at the OECD is clearly the best way forward. 
  • The OECD’s discussion paper, released towards the end of 2019, had discussed a three-tier approach to taxing digital players: 
  • Dividing the MNC’s profits after accounting for expenditure between the countries it operates in, based on a formula linked to sales. The amount of tax will be agreed upon based on consensus. 
  • In regions where the e-commerce operator acts as a distributor, taxability will be based on existing rules of transfer pricing. 
  • Effective dispute resolution mechanisms should also be put in place to settle the litigations. 
Print Friendly and PDF
blog comments powered by Disqus