A conspiracy against inter-faith love


Laws to curb intermarriages are part of a communal agenda

  • In India, intermarriages between people of different regions, castes or religions have to a large extent been prevented by casteism, religious conservatism, and fear of parental authority. 
  • In a country as large and diverse as this, intermarriages are still a rarity. There are few inter-caste marriages and even fewer inter-religious ones. 
  • Surveys large and small confirm that the vast majority of Indians (between 95% and 99% depending on the State) have arranged marriages, which are, by nature, intra-caste and intra-religious. 
  • Between 70% and 80% of Indians across all age groups and religions disapprove of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. 
  • Those of us and our forebears who married across caste groups or across religious communities are a very small minority of around 5% and about 2%, respectively.
  • Yet, for decades, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), through its affiliates, has kept up an attack on the 2%, trying to prevent or break up marriages between Hindus and people of other faiths, primarily Muslims. 
  • When Muslim women marry Hindu men (even abroad), they try to have them “convert” to Hinduism.


No evidence of ‘love jihad’

  • But it is only quite recently that they conjured up a conspiracy theory in support of their campaign. 
  • Starting in coastal Karnataka and northern Kerala in the mid-2000s, Sangh vigilantes claimed that Hindu-Muslim romances were a well-thought-out conspiracy to seduce Hindu women in order to convert them to Islam and produce Muslim children. 
  • It was among these vigilantes that the term ‘love jihad’ was bandied about. A Karnataka Criminal Investigation Department (CID) investigation into complaints of ‘love jihad’ in 2009 concluded that there was no ‘love jihad’, only love and marriage between consenting adults. 
  • But the conspiracy theory, and the term ‘love jihad’, were exported to north India in the run-up to the 2014 general election. 
  • Over the next few years, as the Bharatiya Janata Party gained political ground, the term gained currency, adding another dimension to the Sangh Parivar’s programme of communal polarisation.
  • But keeping the conspiracy theory alive seems to be an important part of the RSS-BJP’s communal political programme. 
  • And so, under the guise of anti-conversion laws, a few BJP State governments have now announced their intention to make ‘love jihad’, a conspiracy theory, a crime punishable by imprisonment. 
  • The conspiracy theory has evolved along the way. Its central premise is that no Hindu woman will fall in love with a man she knows to be a Muslim; Muslims disguise themselves as Hindus to get their way with obedient Hindu women and having ravished them, force them to convert.


Exercising choice

  • Characterising Hindu women as dim-witted and easily led is socially more acceptable than the idea that a woman can love outside artificial social boundaries and exercise choice. 
  • This is borne out by the many examples from across the country of parents using provisions of criminal law on rape and kidnapping to try and break up their daughter’s relationship or marriage, entered into by choice. 
  • There are also examples from across the country of families that have conspired to murder their daughter or her husband or both, because their falling in love is an affront to family authority and to the social order determined by caste and religion.
  • The insidious linking of inter-faith relationships with ‘forcible conversion’, however, gives this campaign a powerful toxicity. 
  • What the BJP State governments are proposing is a law that overturns this premise, by making the validity of a marriage subject to investigation on the basis of third-party complaints. 
  • It makes every Muslim marrying a Hindu suspect. It characterises Muslims as conspirators in a project of proselytisation and colonisation of Hindu wombs. 
  • And it provides legal cover for Sangh organisations to carry on their decades-old campaign of harassment, and worse, against Hindu-Muslim marriages.
  • Nazi Germany’s Nuremburg laws prohibited sexual relations and marriages between Jews and non-Jews. 
  • Violation of the law led to imprisonment and later, incarceration in a concentration camp. 
  • Segregationist U.S. and apartheid South Africa had laws prohibiting inter-racial marriages and sexual relations. 
  • In South Africa, the law was enforced through surveillance and police raids. In both countries, violations were punishable by imprisonment. 
  • In India, the Sangh Parivar can achieve the same ends without a law explicitly banning such marriages, so long as those who are unable to see beyond caste and religion conspire in its plan.
Print Friendly and PDF
blog comments powered by Disqus